The Main Causes of Divorce in South Africa

Under the Divorce Act 70 of 1979, the sole ground for divorce in South Africa is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. There is no separate fault-based ground, but the court must be satisfied on the evidence that the marriage has broken down, and the conduct of the parties — adultery, abuse, desertion, substance abuse, financial mismanagement, communication breakdown, and incompatibility — is what the court weighs in reaching that finding. Statistics South Africa has consistently reported that women initiate the majority of divorce actions (roughly two-thirds in recent annual releases), reflecting that the breakdown is more often experienced, identified, and acted on by women than by men.
The Legal Ground: Irretrievable Breakdown Under the Divorce Act 70 of 1979
Section 4 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 sets the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage as the sole ground for divorce in South Africa. The court must be satisfied on the evidence that the marriage has broken down — a finding of fact, not a fault-based finding.
Specific conduct (adultery, abuse, desertion, substance abuse) is not a separate statutory ground but is evidence the court considers in deciding whether the marriage has broken down. The “no-fault” framing of the Act does not prevent either party from raising conduct that affects division of assets, maintenance, or custody — those consequences are decided separately, on their own facts, once the court has accepted that the marriage itself has broken down.
Key point: South African divorce is a non-fault process. The cause cited in pleadings is not a “blame” finding but evidence the court weighs in deciding whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down.

Adultery and Infidelity
Adultery is among the most commonly cited specific causes in South African divorce pleadings. Even where adultery is cited, the legal question for the court remains whether the marriage has irretrievably broken down — not whether adultery occurred.
Adultery can be relevant to a claim for forfeiture of maintenance benefits by the adulterous spouse and to arguments around dissipation of the joint estate, where marital funds were used to support the extramarital relationship. It rarely, on its own, defeats the divorce itself.
Abuse — Physical, Emotional, and Financial
Domestic violence is a recognised cause, including physical assault, emotional and psychological abuse, and economic abuse (controlling finances, withholding money, gambling the joint estate). A protection order under the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 can run in parallel with a divorce action and is often the first step for an abused spouse.
Abuse-driven divorces frequently involve contested proceedings because the abusive spouse may resist the divorce or dispute the evidence. Where children are involved, the Family Court / Children’s Court engagement on custody and care arrangements is triggered separately.
Safety planning: Where domestic violence is present, a protection order under the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 should be considered alongside the divorce filing, ideally handled by the same attorney for continuity.
Substance Abuse and Addiction
Alcohol and drug abuse by one party are regularly cited in divorce pleadings as conduct making the marriage intolerable. The court weighs ongoing substance abuse as evidence that the marriage cannot reasonably be sustained.
Where substance abuse affects parenting capacity, it has direct consequences for custody and care decisions, and a Family Advocate’s investigation may be requested under section 6 of the Mediation in Certain Divorce Matters Act 24 of 1987.
Communication Breakdown and Emotional Distance
Persistent communication breakdown is the most common but least legally specific cause — usually framed as incompatibility or irreconcilable differences. It often surfaces in court filings as a pattern of behaviour rather than a single incident.
Where communication breakdown is the only ground alleged, the divorce usually proceeds on the parties’ joint assertion that the marriage has broken down, and the cause is recorded without specific evidence being led.
Financial Stress and Mismanagement
Financial mismanagement (debt, gambling, undisclosed liabilities) is a recurring cause cited in SA divorces, particularly where the marriage is in community of property and both spouses are jointly liable for the joint estate’s debts. Financial stress alone rarely decides a divorce — it tends to compound other causes such as communication breakdown or substance abuse.
Where one spouse’s financial conduct has harmed the joint estate, it can affect the equitable distribution of assets on divorce, and may also support a claim for forfeiture of benefits under section 9(1) of the Divorce Act.
Incompatibility, Sexual Incompatibility, and Inability to Have Children
Incompatibility is broadly framed in pleadings as a failure of the spouses to live together as husband and wife in a meaningful way. Sexual incompatibility is sometimes cited, though courts are cautious about the evidence required. The inability to have children (whether due to medical reasons, refusal to try, or a unilateral decision) is cited in some filings, particularly where children were a central expectation of the marriage.
Cultural, Religious, and Family-of-Origin Conflict
Conflict over cultural or religious practice — including extended-family involvement, customary-law expectations, and differing religious observance — is a documented cause in SA divorces. Customary marriages concluded under the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 have their own dissolution procedure and additional considerations around lobola and family negotiation.
Pressure from in-laws or extended family is sometimes cited as a contributing cause rather than the primary one. In customary marriages, section 8 of the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act requires that the court consider all relevant factors, including the customary law consequences of the marriage and the lobola arrangements.
Mental Health and Cognitive Decline
Untreated or poorly managed mental illness in one spouse is a recognised cause. Where a spouse’s mental capacity to consent to or sustain the marriage is in question, additional procedural protections may apply — curatorship under the Mental Health Care Act 17 of 2002 and legal representation to protect that spouse’s interests during the divorce.
How the Cited Cause Affects the Divorce Process
The cause cited in pleadings shapes how the divorce proceeds — how contested it is, how long it takes, and what evidence must be led.
| Pathway | When It Applies | Typical Timeline |
|---|---|---|
| Uncontested divorce | Both parties agree the marriage has broken down and the specific cause is not contested | Six to eight weeks from filing to order where there are no minor children |
| Contested divorce | The cited cause is denied, one party opposes the divorce, or there are disputed consequences (custody, assets, maintenance) | Six months to several years, depending on the issues in dispute and the court roll |
| Defended divorce | One party alleges the marriage has not broken down | Rare and difficult to sustain under the current Act |
The cited cause has minimal impact on the procedural path where there are no children and the parties agree on division of assets — the cause is recorded, but the file moves forward on the joint assertion of breakdown.
Comparing the Common Causes
| Cause | Frequency Cited in SA Filings | Typical Impact on Process | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adultery | High | Can complicate settlement but rarely defeats the divorce itself | Adultery alone does not bar a divorce |
| Abuse (physical/emotional/financial) | High | Usually contested; protection orders often run in parallel | Triggers separate safety planning |
| Substance abuse | Moderate | Often contested where parenting is in issue | Affects custody assessments |
| Communication breakdown | Very high | Often uncontested — no specific evidence required | Most common catch-all cause |
| Financial stress / mismanagement | Moderate | Rarely dispositive on its own | Relevant to division of joint estate |
| Incompatibility / irreconcilable differences | Very high | Often uncontested | General-purpose cause |
| Mental health / capacity | Lower | Procedural protections may apply | Curatorship may be needed |
What Couples Considering Divorce Should Know
- South African divorce is a non-fault process — the cause cited is not a “blame” finding but evidence that the marriage has broken down.
- An attorney can advise on whether the cause cited will be relevant to maintenance, custody, or division of assets, where the conduct of the parties continues to have legal consequences even after the divorce itself is granted.
- Mediation is available as an alternative to contested litigation — qualified mediators (Burger Huyser has qualified mediators on staff) can help resolve the parenting and property consequences.
- Domestic violence situations warrant both a protection order and a divorce filing, ideally handled by the same attorney for continuity.
Where Divorce Is Filed in South Africa
The Divorce Act 70 of 1979 is national legislation, and there is no provincial variation in the substantive grounds for divorce. Cases are filed in the Regional Court of the Magistrate’s Court where there are no minor children and the parties consent, or in the Divorce Court in the relevant provincial division of the High Court where the matter is contested or where minor children are involved.
Burger Huyser Attorneys practises across Gauteng from its head office in Linden (Randburg) and from branches in Sandton, Roodepoort, Bedfordview, Alberton, Midrand, Pretoria (Menlyn), and Centurion. The firm handles uncontested and contested divorce, divorce mediation with qualified mediators on staff, asset division, maintenance disputes, and settlement agreements. The firm’s Family Law and Divorce team can advise at the initial consultation on whether a matter calls for divorce, separation, a maintenance application, or a protection order.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the legal ground for divorce in South Africa?
The sole ground is the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage under section 4 of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979. There is no separate fault-based ground, but the court considers the conduct of the parties — including adultery, abuse, desertion, or substance abuse — as evidence of whether the marriage has broken down.
Do I need to prove a specific cause to get divorced?
No — the court must be satisfied that the marriage has irretrievably broken down, but the specific conduct cited is not a separate legal requirement. Where both spouses agree the marriage has broken down and file a joint petition, no specific cause need be proved.
Does adultery affect the outcome of a divorce?
Adultery alone does not prevent a divorce and is not a separate ground. It may, however, affect the division of assets where adultery is linked to dissipation of the joint estate, and in limited circumstances it can support a forfeiture of maintenance benefits by the adulterous spouse.
Can I get divorced if my spouse won’t agree?
Yes — where one spouse believes the marriage has irretrievably broken down and files a sole petition, the court can grant the divorce on the evidence even if the other spouse opposes it. Defended divorces on the basis that the marriage has not broken down are rare and difficult to sustain under the current Act.
Does abuse affect the divorce?
Abuse is relevant both as evidence of irretrievable breakdown and as a factor in custody and maintenance decisions. A spouse experiencing domestic violence should also consider a protection order under the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998, which can run alongside the divorce.
How long does a divorce take in South Africa?
An uncontested divorce with no minor children typically takes six to eight weeks from filing to order. A contested divorce, or one involving minor children, can take six months to several years depending on the issues in dispute and the court’s roll.
Can a customary marriage be divorced on the same grounds?
Yes — the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 applies to customary marriages, but the Recognition of Customary Marriages Act 120 of 1998 introduces additional considerations around lobola, family negotiation, and the proprietary consequences of the marriage.
Which spouse usually files for divorce in South Africa?
Statistics South Africa has consistently reported that women initiate the majority of divorce actions — roughly two-thirds in recent annual releases — reflecting that the breakdown of the marriage is more often experienced, identified, and acted on by women than by men.
If you are considering divorce — whether uncontested, contested, or after a period of separation — Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Family Law and Divorce team can advise on your situation from the firm’s branches across Gauteng. The firm handles uncontested and contested divorce, divorce mediation (with qualified mediators on staff), asset division, maintenance disputes, and settlement agreements. Book an initial consultation through the head office in Linden on 011 888 0246 or through any of the firm’s branches across Gauteng, including Centurion, Pretoria (Menlyn), Sandton, Roodepoort, Bedfordview, Alberton, and Midrand. The firm carries a 4.8/5 average across 250+ Google reviews (Trustindex verified “Top Rated Law Firm in South Africa”) and is a Best Family Law Firm and Best Multi-Sector Law Firm award winner.
General Information Disclaimer: This article is general information about the causes of divorce under the Divorce Act 70 of 1979, not legal advice for a specific situation. Every divorce involves its own facts around marriage regime, children, assets, and conduct, and parties considering divorce should consult a qualified attorney about their particular circumstances. Confirm current procedural requirements with the Legal Practice Council (lpc.org.za) and the relevant court office.
NEED TOP LEGAL SUPPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA? CONTACT OUR LAWYERS TODAY.
Contact our team of experienced law attorneys at Burger Huyser Attorneys to assist you in all matters and procedures.
CONTACT DETAILS

