Cyberbullying And Children: Legal Recourse For South African Parents

South African parents dealing with cyberbullying of a child can pursue recourse under a layered framework: criminal reporting through SAPS (particularly for threats, extortion, sexual offences, or child pornography), complaints to the Film and Publication Board for harmful online content under the Films and Publications Act 65 of 1996, criminal charges under the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 for unlawful access to or distribution of data, complaints and interdicts grounded in POPIA for unlawful publication of a child’s personal information, and protection orders under the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 where cyber-harassment amounts to the relevant statutory harm. Civil remedies — including interdicts and defamation claims — sit alongside the criminal route, and a parent typically starts by documenting the conduct (screenshots with metadata), reporting through the appropriate channel, and engaging an attorney where school disciplinary processes fail or the conduct crosses into criminal territory.
What South African Law Treats as Cyberbullying
No single South African statute uses the word “cyberbullying.” The conduct is captured across several overlapping laws, each addressing a different element of what an act of online harassment looks like in practice. The result is a layered toolkit: a parent facing a serious incident will usually need to identify which statute fits the behaviour, then route the complaint to the correct body.
The conduct elements most commonly engaged fall into five buckets:
- Criminal conduct — unlawful access to data, unlawful interception of communications, and the unlawful distribution of intimate images are criminalised by the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020.
- Harmful content — harassment, hate speech, threats, and pornographic material involving children are regulated by the Films and Publications Act 65 of 1996 and enforced by the Film and Publication Board (FPB).
- Online sexual offences against children — including grooming and exposure — are charged under the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007, regardless of whether the conduct happened online or in person.
- Personal-information misuse — exposing a child’s details or “doxxing” — falls within the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA), enforced by the Information Regulator.
- Constitutional baseline — section 28 of the Constitution gives every child the right to be protected from maltreatment, neglect, abuse or degradation; this right underpins every other statutory remedy.

The Statutory Toolkit at a Glance
| Statute | What it covers | Where to report / act |
|---|---|---|
| Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 | Unlawful access, interception, distribution of intimate images, data-related fraud | SAPS at any police station; complex matters are routed to SAPS cyber-related units |
| Films and Publications Act 65 of 1996 | Harmful online content, hate speech, child pornography, distribution restrictions | Film and Publication Board (FPB) |
| Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007 | Online sexual offences against children, including exposure and grooming | SAPS — Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) units |
| Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013 (POPIA) | Unlawful processing or publication of a child’s personal information | Information Regulator; civil damages claim |
| Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 | Cyber-harassment that meets the statutory definition of “domestic violence” | Magistrate’s Court — protection order |
| Children’s Act 38 of 2005 | Children’s rights, best-interests principle, child-protection interventions | Designated child protection organisations; Children’s Court |
Step-by-Step: What a Parent Should Do in the First 72 Hours
- Document the conduct — capture screenshots with visible metadata (timestamps, usernames, URLs), and save them to a location the child cannot access and the bully cannot delete.
- Do not delete or respond — preserve the evidence. Deleting messages or engaging the bully can complicate later reporting and may be viewed as interference with a potential case.
- Tell the child it is not their fault — and identify a trusted adult (parent, teacher, school counsellor) for ongoing support.
- Notify the school — if the bully is a fellow learner, the school has a duty under the Children’s Act and the Department of Basic Education’s policies on learner-on-learner harassment. Keep a written record of every communication.
- Report to the platform — most platforms host dedicated cyberbullying reporting flows and carry duty-of-care obligations for content involving minors.
- Decide on criminal reporting — if the conduct includes threats, extortion, sexual content, identity exposure, or sustained stalking, open a case at the nearest SAPS station or the FCS unit.
- Complain to the Film and Publication Board — for harmful content the platform has not removed, particularly where it targets or involves a minor.
- Consult an attorney — to assess civil remedies (interdict, defamation claim, POPIA complaint) and, where relevant, a protection-order application.
Criminal Reporting: When and How to Approach SAPS
Cyberbullying that involves threats, extortion, identity theft, sexual offences, child pornography, or stalking is criminal conduct and should be reported to SAPS without delay. The Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) units handle matters involving child victims and are the correct unit for cyberbullying cases with a sexual or violent element. A parent can open a case at any police station under the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020; for complex matters the case is routed to specialised SAPS cyber-related units.
When reporting, bring the documented evidence (screenshots, URLs, account handles, dates) and the child’s details; request a CAS number and a reference for the investigating officer. A case opened with SAPS is a prerequisite to most downstream civil and regulatory action — without a CAS number, other bodies such as the FPB and the Information Regulator cannot act on the same facts. Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Roodepoort branch fields cyber-law and family-law instructions under admitted attorney Natasha Earle and can brief a parent on what evidence to bring before opening the case, so that the criminal route and a parallel civil strategy are aligned from the outset.
Harmful Content and the Film and Publication Board
The Film and Publication Board (FPB) regulates the classification and distribution of online content in South Africa under the Films and Publications Act 65 of 1996. Parents can lodge a complaint with the FPB about harmful online content targeting or involving a child — particularly where platforms have failed to act after a report.
The FPB has the power to direct the removal or restriction of harmful content and to refer matters for prosecution. A practical FPB complaint works best when paired with documented evidence (URLs, screenshots, account identifiers) and a clear description of the conduct. Where the content overlaps with criminal conduct (threats, child pornography, sexual offences), the FPB complaint sits alongside, not in place of, a SAPS case.
Protection Orders Under the Domestic Violence Act
The Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 protects against a defined list of harms — including harassment and emotional, verbal and psychological abuse — and is not limited to conduct that occurs in person. A child who is being cyberbullied by a parent, family member, or someone in a domestic relationship may qualify for a protection order on the same footing as for physical abuse.
A protection order can include terms prohibiting further contact, including online contact, and can authorise police arrest if breached. Applications are made to the Magistrate’s Court on Form 4 in the prescribed manner, and interim protection orders can be granted on the same day in urgent cases. A protection order does not require a criminal case to be open — it is a civil remedy available independently, and parents can pursue it alongside — or while awaiting — SAPS action.
Need help choosing the right route? A cyberbullying matter can straddle criminal, regulatory, and civil remedies at once. Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Family Law team — with cyber-law capability at the Roodepoort branch under admitted attorney Natasha Earle, and files coordinated through the Linden/Randburg head office — can assess the matter and recommend the right first step.
Civil Remedies: Interdicts and Defamation
Alongside the criminal and regulatory routes, civil remedies give a parent practical control over the conduct itself:
- Interdict — an attorney can approach the High Court (or the Magistrate’s Court, depending on the relief sought) for an interdict restraining further harassment or publication of harmful content. An interim order can be granted urgently, with a return date for the respondent to show cause.
- Defamation — common-law defamation claims are available where the cyberbullying imputations are wrongful and published to third parties. The remedy is damages and, in appropriate cases, a published apology or retraction.
- POPIA civil remedies — damages claims for unlawful processing or publication of a child’s personal information are available under the Protection of Personal Information Act 4 of 2013, and may run alongside a complaint to the Information Regulator.
Each of these routes requires an attorney to draft the founding papers, set out the facts, and represent the family at hearing — exactly the kind of work Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Roodepoort branch handles through Natasha Earle, with cross-branch support from the Linden/Randburg head office where a Gauteng-wide response is needed.
The School’s Role and When to Engage It Formally
South African schools have a duty under the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 and the Department of Basic Education’s policies to address learner-on-learner harassment, including online conduct with school-based effects. A formal written complaint to the principal is the first step; the school is expected to investigate, apply its disciplinary code, and take protective measures where the conduct occurred between learners.
Where the school fails to act or the conduct is serious, a parent can escalate to the district Department of Basic Education office and, ultimately, the South African Council for Educators (SACE) for matters involving educator conduct. Where the school is itself the source of the harm, or has clearly failed in its protective duty, a parent can approach an attorney to advise on civil remedies against the school — a route that fits naturally alongside a Cybercrimes Act or protection-order application.
Acting in Gauteng: Where the Statutory Framework Meets the Family
Cyberbullying is governed by national statutes, and reporting is funnelled to national bodies (SAPS, the Film and Publication Board, and the Information Regulator). For parents in Gauteng, the practical question is rarely which statute applies — it is which office or unit to engage first, and which attorney can take instructions on a matter that may straddle criminal, regulatory, and civil pathways at the same time.
Burger Huyser Attorneys fields cyber-law and family-law instructions through its Roodepoort branch (16 Galena Avenue, Helderkruin, telephone 011 668 0030, after-hours 061 516 0091), which is the firm’s working centre for cyber-related family-law work under admitted attorney Natasha Earle, with files coordinated through the head office at 49 First Avenue, Linden, Randburg (011 888 0246) for matters that need a multi-branch response. Cyberbullying files often arrive at the Family Law Department through a referral from a school, a paediatrician, or another attorney; the firm is set up to take instructions from any of the Gauteng branches — Randburg, Roodepoort, Sandton, Pretoria, Centurion, Bedfordview, Alberton, and Midrand — for parents who would rather engage a local office first.
National reporting channels remain the correct starting point regardless of where the family is based: SAPS for criminal conduct (with FCS routing for sexual or violent matters), the Film and Publication Board for harmful online content involving minors, the Information Regulator for POPIA complaints, and the Magistrate’s Court for protection-order applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is cyberbullying a crime in South Africa?
Cyberbullying is not a single offence, but many of the acts that make it up are criminal. Threats, extortion, online sexual offences against children, child pornography, identity theft, and unlawful access to data are charged under the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020, the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters) Act 32 of 2007, and the Films and Publications Act 65 of 1996. The right charge depends on the conduct — a parent should report to SAPS and let the investigating officer route the matter.
Where do I report cyberbullying of my child in South Africa?
Report criminal conduct to SAPS at your nearest police station or, for sexual or violent conduct, to the Family Violence, Child Protection and Sexual Offences (FCS) unit. Report harmful content targeting a minor to the Film and Publication Board (FPB). Report unlawful publication of personal information to the Information Regulator under POPIA. Report the conduct to the platform hosting it as well — most platforms have a dedicated cyberbullying reporting flow and a duty-of-care obligation for content involving minors.
Can a child get a protection order against cyberbullying?
Yes, where the cyberbullying meets the definition of “domestic violence” under the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 — including harassment and emotional, verbal or psychological abuse, whether online or offline. A child who is being cyberbullied by a parent, family member, or person in a relevant domestic relationship can apply for a protection order through the Magistrate’s Court on Form 4, and an interim order can be granted on the same day in urgent cases.
Do I need an attorney for a cyberbullying matter?
An attorney is required for civil remedies — interdicts, defamation claims, POPIA damages claims — and is strongly advisable for any matter involving school disciplinary processes, regulatory complaints, or criminal-charging strategy. Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Family Law team, with cyber-law capability at the Roodepoort branch, can assess the appropriate route and represent the family.
Will reporting to SAPS actually help?
Cyberbullying matters with a criminal element are reportable under the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 and other statutes, and SAPS has a duty to open a case and issue a CAS number. The earlier the report and the better the documented evidence (screenshots, URLs, dates, account identifiers), the more likely the matter can be investigated and, where appropriate, referred to a specialised unit.
What can I do if the school does nothing?
Escalate in writing to the district Department of Basic Education office, then to the provincial department. Where an educator is involved, lodge a complaint with the South African Council for Educators (SACE). Where the school is itself the source of the harm or has failed in its protective duty, a parent can approach an attorney to advise on civil remedies against the school.
If your child is experiencing cyberbullying and you are weighing the criminal, regulatory, or civil options, Burger Huyser Attorneys’ Family Law team can assess the matter and represent the family. The Roodepoort branch (16 Galena Avenue, Helderkruin, 011 668 0030, after-hours 061 516 0091) is the firm’s working centre for cyber-law and family-law instructions, with files coordinated through the Linden/Randburg head office (49 First Avenue, 011 888 0246) where a multi-branch response is needed. The firm carries a 4.8/5 average across 250+ Google reviews (Trustindex verified “Top Rated Law Firm in South Africa”) and was named Best Family Law Firm 2024 by Lawyers Monthly and Family Law Firm of the Year 2024 by MEA Business Awards. Initial consultations are booked through the branch you would prefer to engage; bring the documented evidence (screenshots with metadata, URLs, account identifiers, dates) and a short timeline of what has happened so far.
General Information Disclaimer: This article is general legal information about the recourse available to South African parents whose children experience cyberbullying. It is not legal advice for a specific case — every matter turns on its own facts, and the right route depends on what was said or done, by whom, and under what circumstances. Confirm the current statutory requirements with the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development, the South African Police Service, the Film and Publication Board, or the Information Regulator (for POPIA matters), and consult a qualified attorney about your own situation before taking action that affects your family’s rights or safety.
NEED TOP LEGAL SUPPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA? CONTACT OUR LAWYERS TODAY.
Contact our team of experienced law attorneys at Burger Huyser Attorneys to assist you in all matters and procedures.
CONTACT DETAILS

