Road Accident Fund Lawyers Fees | How Much For A RAF Attorney

Road Accident Fund (RAF) attorney fees in South Africa are capped by statute at a percentage of the total amount recovered from the Fund on a successful claim. The cap is set under regulations published in terms of the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (as amended by Act 19 of 2005 and subsequent amending Acts), and it applies regardless of the fee arrangement negotiated between attorney and client. The current operative cap is 25% of the total recovery (including past and future loss of earnings, general damages, medical and hospital expenses, and loss of support). Most RAF attorneys work on a contingency-fee (“no win, no fee”) basis under a written, signed mandate, charge VAT on top of their fee, and recover disbursements — sheriff’s fees, expert medical reports, transport costs, copying — separately from the percentage cap. Before signing a mandate, a claimant is entitled to a written explanation of what the fee percentage will be, what disbursements are anticipated, and what happens to fees if the claim is unsuccessful.
How RAF Attorney Fees Are Regulated
The RAF is a state-owned statutory insurer established under the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (as amended by Act 19 of 2005 and subsequent amending Acts). It is not a private short-term insurer, and the fee regime that applies to RAF matters is set by regulation rather than by contractual freedom between attorney and client.
The key features of the regulatory framework:
- Statutory cap on the fee percentage — attorney fees on RAF claims are capped by regulations made under the Act. The current cap is 25% of the total amount recovered from the Fund, including past and future loss of earnings, general damages, medical and hospital expenses, and loss of support.
- Rules Board for Courts of Law Act — governs the broader attorney-and-client fee framework for matters in the Magistrate’s Court and High Court, but RAF-specific regulations take precedence on RAF matters.
- Contingency Fees Act 66 of 1997 — sets the formal requirements for any “no win, no fee” mandate signed between attorney and client.
- Unenforceability of the excess — a fee agreement that exceeds the statutory cap is unenforceable to the extent of the excess. The attorney may not recover more than the cap from the proceeds of the RAF payout.
- “No win, no fee” does not override the cap — the same percentage rule applies once there is a recovery; a contingency arrangement changes who bears the risk of an unsuccessful claim, not the percentage ceiling.

What the Cap Covers — and What It Doesn’t
The percentage cap applies to the attorney’s professional fee on the recovery from the RAF. Disbursements — the out-of-pocket expenses incurred running the file — are charged separately and are not subject to the percentage cap. VAT is added on top of both the capped fee and the disbursements; VAT is not absorbed into the percentage.
Common disbursements on a RAF claim include:
- Sheriff’s fees for service of process
- Independent medical examinations and medico-legal reports — typically required to prove the nature and extent of the injuries
- Accident reconstruction or mechanical engineering reports — used where liability is disputed
- Obtaining police dockets, J88 forms, and hospital records
- Translation of foreign documents for cross-border claims
- Travel and transport for the claimant to attend medicals and consultations
- Filing fees and court fees if the matter is litigated
- Counsel (advocate) fees where briefed
Because disbursements are not capped by the percentage rule, they can materially affect the net amount the claimant receives from a RAF payout. A clear mandate should set out which disbursements are anticipated, when they fall due, and who is liable for them if the claim is unsuccessful.
The Contingency Fee Mandate — What the Attorney Must Put in Writing
RAF attorneys almost always work on contingency: the claimant pays nothing if the claim fails, and the attorney is paid from the recovery. The Contingency Fees Act 66 of 1997 governs these mandates alongside the RAF-specific regulations.
The mandate must be in writing, signed by the claimant, and must set out:
- The exact fee percentage the attorney will charge on the recovery
- Which disbursements the claimant is liable for, and when
- What happens to fees and disbursements if the claim is unsuccessful
- The claimant’s right to terminate the mandate, and the financial consequences of doing so
A claimant should not sign a mandate that does not include each of the above. The Contingency Fees Act gives a claimant a cooling-off right and a route to challenge a mandate that is alleged to be unreasonable.
Stages of a RAF Claim and How Fees Build Up
RAF matters move through recognisable stages, and the work done at each one drives both the percentage fee (which is taken on the eventual payout) and the disbursement stack.
Lodgement and merits stage
The claim form is lodged with the RAF; liability is investigated. Work in this stage is significant even though no fees are charged on a monthly basis — it drives much of the file’s eventual cost.
Quantum stage
Once liability is conceded, quantum is negotiated: past and future medical expenses, loss of earnings, general damages, and loss of support for dependants. This is where the bulk of the recoverable amount is built.
Interim payments
RAF regulations allow partial payments where liability is conceded and a defined portion of quantum is agreed. Each interim payment attracts a proportional fee on the amount actually paid out.
Settlement versus trial
Most RAF claims settle without trial. Matters that go to trial incur additional counsel fees, expert fees, and court fees, all of which form part of the disbursement stack.
Post-settlement administration
Payment of medical liens, settlement of provider accounts, and final accounting. This stage is short but procedural, and any errors in the final accounting can be challenged by the claimant in writing.
What Determines the Fee You Actually Pay
Because the fee is a percentage of the eventual recovery, the work done and the disbursements incurred during the file are not the only drivers of the fee in rand terms. The main determinants are:
- Quantum of the recovery — a smaller payout produces a smaller fee even where the work was substantial
- Complexity of liability — disputed-merits claims require more investigation, expert input, and often litigation, which affects both fee work and disbursements
- Quantum disputes — contested quantum requires medico-legal reports and sometimes actuarial calculation, which drives disbursements up
- Stage at which the matter resolves — claims that settle early on conceded liability cost less in fee work than claims that go to trial
- Whether the mandate is capped or uncapped percentage — both are permissible, but the percentage itself cannot exceed the statutory maximum
Fee Comparison at a Glance
| Cost component | Subject to 25% cap? | Who pays? | Typical range / notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attorney professional fee (% of RAF recovery) | Yes | From RAF payout | Capped at 25% of total recovery under current regulations |
| Sheriff’s fees | No (disbursement) | From RAF payout / claimant | Set by sheriff’s tariff |
| Medico-legal expert reports | No (disbursement) | From RAF payout / claimant | Varies by expert and complexity |
| Filing and court fees | No (disbursement) | From RAF payout / claimant | Set by court rules |
| Counsel (advocate) fees | No (disbursement) | From RAF payout / claimant | Per advocate’s brief fee or tariff |
| VAT on attorney fee | Charged on top of capped fee | From RAF payout / claimant | Standard VAT rate |
| VAT on disbursements | Charged on top of disbursement | From RAF payout / claimant | Standard VAT rate |
What to Watch Out for in a RAF Fee Mandate
Most mandates are well-drafted, but a few clauses recur as sources of dispute. Read carefully for:
- Clauses that attempt to charge more than the statutory cap — any such clause should be flagged and revised before signing; it is unenforceable to the extent of the excess.
- Disbursement risk transfer — some mandates require the claimant to pay disbursements out-of-pocket before settlement; most allow disbursements to be recovered from the RAF payout, but the wording matters.
- The termination clause — if the mandate is ended partway through, the attorney may still claim a fee for work done, calculated either by hours or by reference to the eventual settlement.
- Costs orders on a defended claim — confirm who is responsible for paying the RAF’s own legal costs if the matter is defended and goes to trial. These are usually awarded against the RAF on a successful claim but can be disputed.
Looking at the choice of attorney, the same criteria that govern any litigation mandate apply: a transparent written breakdown of the percentage, anticipated disbursements, and VAT before any mandate is signed; a clear explanation of what happens to fees and disbursements if the claim fails; and direct access to the practitioner running the file rather than a call centre. Burger Huyser Attorneys runs its RAF files through its Head of General Litigation, Nadine Roesch-Prinsloo, who holds motor-vehicle accident claims as a stated specialisation.
When Fees Can Be Challenged
If the attorney charges more than the statutory cap, the claimant can challenge the excess in writing and, if necessary, lodge a complaint with the Legal Practice Council (lpc.org.za). Fee disputes can also be referred to the relevant attorneys’ association for taxation or assessment. The Contingency Fees Act sets out the formal process for reviewing a contingency-fee agreement that is alleged to be unreasonable — including the right to have the agreement cancelled within a defined cooling-off period after signing.
Where the Claim Is Filed — Forum by Quantum
Because the RAF is a national statutory insurer, the fee cap applies uniformly across South Africa; there is no provincial or municipal variation in the percentage cap itself. What does vary by location is the forum in which a RAF claim is litigated:
- Claims up to R400 000 fall within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Court in the district where the accident occurred or where the claimant resides.
- Claims above R400 000 are filed in the relevant High Court division — for matters arising across Gauteng, this is the Gauteng Division of the High Court, with its Pretoria seat for matters arising in the northern parts of the province and its Johannesburg seat for the rest.
The underlying RAF claim form is filed with the RAF itself regardless of forum. The choice of court drives the procedural layer for any defended litigation and the cost of counsel. The Legal Practice Council and the RAF’s own claims portal are the authoritative current sources for the statutory fee cap, the prescribed claim forms, and any updates to the published fee regulations — fee regulations are amended periodically and the working cap can shift, so practitioners and claimants alike should confirm the operative version at the time of signing a mandate.
If you have a Road Accident Fund claim and want to talk through the fee structure, the contingency mandate, and how disbursements will be handled on your specific matter, contact Burger Huyser Attorneys’ general litigation practice on 011 888 0246 (after-hours 061 516 6878) or visit the head office at 49 First Avenue, Linden, Randburg, 2194. The firm runs RAF files through its Head of General Litigation, who holds motor-vehicle accident claims as a stated specialisation, and will give you a transparent written breakdown of the percentage fee, anticipated disbursements, and VAT before any mandate is signed. The firm carries a 4.8/5 average across 250+ Google reviews (Trustindex verified “Top Rated Law Firm in South Africa”) and fields this work across all eight Gauteng branches.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much does a Road Accident Fund attorney cost in South Africa?
RAF attorney fees are capped by regulation at a percentage of the total amount recovered from the Fund — the current statutory cap is 25% of the total recovery. The fee is normally charged under a written contingency-fee mandate signed by the claimant. VAT is added on top of the capped fee, and disbursements (sheriff’s fees, medico-legal reports, counsel, filing fees) are charged separately and are not subject to the cap.
Do I have to pay a RAF attorney if I lose my claim?
Under a properly drafted contingency-fee mandate (“no win, no fee”), the claimant does not owe the attorney a professional fee if the claim is unsuccessful. Disbursements are handled separately — most mandates allow disbursements to be recovered from the RAF payout if successful, but require the claimant to settle outstanding disbursements if the claim fails. The mandate should set this out clearly before it is signed.
What is the difference between attorney fees and disbursements on a RAF claim?
Attorney fees are the professional fee charged for the legal work, capped at the statutory percentage of the recovery. Disbursements are out-of-pocket costs incurred running the file — sheriff’s fees, medico-legal experts, counsel, filing fees, transport, and document costs. Disbursements are not capped by the percentage rule and are recovered separately, plus VAT.
Can a RAF attorney charge more than the regulated percentage?
No. Any clause in a fee mandate that purports to charge more than the statutory cap is unenforceable to the extent of the excess. If an attorney attempts to recover more than the cap from the proceeds of a RAF payout, the claimant can dispute the excess in writing and refer the dispute to the Legal Practice Council.
How long does a RAF claim take to settle?
Timing depends on whether liability is conceded and how quickly quantum is agreed. Straightforward claims on conceded liability commonly settle within 12 to 24 months; matters involving disputed liability, contested quantum, or formal litigation in the Magistrate’s Court or High Court typically take two to four years or longer to finalise. Interim payments may be available on conceded liability.
What should I bring to my first meeting with a RAF attorney?
The accident report (AR) number, the police case number, photographs of the scene and vehicles, details of witnesses, hospital records and J88 form, details of any Income Tax and UIF contributions on lost earnings, identity document, proof of residence, and any correspondence already received from the RAF or its agents. The attorney will confirm the full intake checklist at the first consultation.
Does Burger Huyser Attorneys handle RAF claims?
Yes — the firm’s general litigation practice handles RAF claims, with the Head of General Litigation holding motor-vehicle accident claims as a stated specialisation. Intake is coordinated through the head office in Linden, Randburg (49 First Avenue, 011 888 0246); clients across Gauteng can also reach the firm through any of its branches (Roodepoort, Sandton, Bedfordview, Centurion, Pretoria/Menlyn, Alberton, Midrand).
General Information Disclaimer: This article explains the general framework for Road Accident Fund attorney fees in South Africa under the Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996 (as amended) and the regulations made under it. It is general information, not legal advice for a specific claim — every RAF matter involves its own facts around liability, quantum, and disbursements, and claimants should confirm the current statutory fee cap, the prescribed claim forms, and the operative regulations directly with the Road Accident Fund (raf.co.za) and the Legal Practice Council (lpc.org.za) before signing any fee mandate.
NEED TOP LEGAL SUPPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA? CONTACT OUR LAWYERS TODAY.
Contact our team of experienced law attorneys at Burger Huyser Attorneys to assist you in all matters and procedures.
CONTACT DETAILS

